Ultraouns pregnant woman

North Carolina Requires Ultrasounds Before Abortion

Share:

North Carolina pro-life supporters are celebrating as a new measure will be enforced to discourage women from getting abortions.

On Thursday the North Carolina Senate overrode Democratic Gov. Bev Perdue’s veto of a mandatory ultrasound bill in a 29 to 19 vote.

Doctors in the state will now be required to give an ultrasound to women seeking an abortion before performing the procedure. They also must describe the fetus in detail. Women will have to wait 24 hours before being allowed to kill their baby.

According to Reuters, Elizabeth Nash, public policy associate with Guttmacher Institute in Washington says North Carolina is joining “25 other U.S. states that require pre-abortion counseling that goes beyond basic medical ‘informed consent.’”

Nash also said it is the tenth state to include an ultrasound, an additional requirement.

“It’s a historic vote,” Barbara Holt, president of N.C. Right to Life, told the Charlotte Observer. “It’s exciting to see it pass. It’s what we’ve hoped for, worked for for so many years.”

Perdue vetoed the bill on June 27, calling the legislation a “dangerous intrusion into the confidential relationship that exists between women and their doctors” in her veto message.

The primary sponsor of the bill, Republican Rep. Ruth Samuelson, says it is vital information for women who are making a major decision.

“If a 24-hour waiting period saves one life, I would hope that all of us here would likewise agree that any inconvenience to the doctor or patient [was] also worth it, and was insignificant,” Republican Sen. Warren Daniel said.

Although a woman will be free to look away and ignore an explanation and description of the image on the screen, law will require one be presented and the sound of the fetal heartbeat be offered.

The Center for Reproductive Rights is challenging similar laws in Oklahoma and Texas, and in the process of reviewing North Carolina’s law. According to The News & Observer, the organization claims that the law may violate the rights of patients “to avoid unwanted, government-mandated speech in the privacy of a medical office.”

“A law that requires a woman to cover her ears and hum, I really don’t view that as a right,” said Jordan Goldberg, the organization’s state advocacy counsel.

Share:

Leave a Reply


More Spiritual Content
Bethel Music Brings Worship to NBC’s ‘Kelly Clarkson Show’ on Good Friday
‘Take My Soul, Lucifer!’: Shocking Fan Chants Sparking Fear of Rising Satanic Obsession
New ‘King of Kings’ Film Brings Jesus’ Story to Life Through Charles Dickens
Video: Worship Fills the White House as Resurrection Day Nears
Grieving Mother’s Bold Prayer Rocks White House
President Trump: ‘Miracles of Holy Week’ in Powerful Easter Prayer Service!
GOP Headquarters Torched, Suspect Linked to Antifa Movement
Pro-Hamas Student Walks Into Immigration Office, Walks Out in Handcuffs
1-Month-Old Taken at Gunpoint: Is This a Warning of What’s Coming Now?
Explosive New Law Sparks Global Concern Over Criminalized Prayer
previous arrow
next arrow
Shadow

Most Popular Posts

Latest Videos

Share