Judicial Watch Wants to Get to the Bottom of James Comey’s Memos

Former FBI Director James Comey
Share:

Following former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee, President Donald Trump’s personal attorney is reportedly filing an official complaint with the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General.

Comey told senators he handed over copies of several memos about his meetings with the president to “a good friend at Columbia University,” with the intent that they would then be leaked to the liberal mainstream media. While it’s not clear that the memos themselves contain classified information, they were produced on a laptop set up to handle classified information.

Even if the information isn’t classified, the Supreme Court has broadly established that most communication with the president is privileged. That means it cannot be shared with anyone else without the president’s permission.

At the very least, it’s a violation of government ethics policies. It could be much worse than that. To know for sure, the contents of those memos need to be investigated, but the FBI refuses to provide them, even to the members of Congress investigating the matters to which they pertain.

Judicial Watch, however, has already been requesting a copy of that memo in order to make it publicly available. According to the government watchdog group, it sent a Freedom of Information Act request for the February memo May 16 via certified mail to the FBI’s Record/Information Dissemination Section located in Winchester, Virginia.

Judicial Watch posted images of the two-page letter to its Twitter account on Friday. In so doing, it stated that while Comey had no problem sharing the memo with a friend for the purpose of leaking it to the liberal mainstream media, the FBI has ignored its FOIA request, which stated, in part:

Judicial Watch Inc. (“Judicial Watch”) hereby requests that the Federal Bureau of Investigation produce the following records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act …

The memorandum written by former Director James Comey memorializing his meeting and conversation with President Trump regarding the FBI’s investigation of potential Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election. For purposes of clarification, this memorandum was reportedly written on or about February 13, 2017, and is the subject of a New York Times article (enclosed) dated May 16, 2017.

Please determine whether to comply with this request within the time period required by FOIA and notify us immediately of your determination, the reasons therefor, and the right to appeal any adverse determination to the head of the agency or his or her designee. … Please also produce all responsive records in an electronic format (“PDF” is preferred), if convenient. We also are willing to accept a “rolling production” of responsive records if it will facilitate a more timely production.

One week later, on May 22, Judicial Watch sent a second FOIA request to the FBI asking for all of Comey’s memos relating to conversations held with any of the following people:

  • President Barack Obama
  • Vice President Joe Biden
  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
  • Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)
  • House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)
  • Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)

On June 8, the government watchdog organization made an additional FOIA request for:

  • Any and all memoranda memorializing any meeting or telephonic conversation between former FBI Director James Comey and President Donald Trump that have been provided to the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and/or any employee or representative thereof by Mr. Comey and/or any other FBI employee or representative.
  • Any and all other records that have been provided to the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and/or any employee or representative thereof by Mr. Comey and/or any other FBI employee or representative.

To date, the FBI has not responded to any of those requests.

“Comey was wrong to selectively leak potentially classified [information] in order to politicize an investigation,” the government watchdog group stated. “[Judicial Watch] is demanding the truth.”

+ posts
Share:

Related topics:

See an error in this article?

Send us a correction

To contact us or to submit an article

Click and play our featured shows

Painting,

Biblical Prosperity: ‘What’s in Your Hand?’

(Editor’s Note: This is Part 1 of a three-part series, “Steps for Biblical Prosperity and Success in ’24.” Watch Charisma News for Parts 2 and 3, coming soon.) The root Hebrew word translated in the Old Testament as “prosperity” can...

Symbol of the Emmys.

Emmys Push Sinister Messages to Children

In the wake of an Emmys program overshadowed by the Republican Iowa Caucus results, a dark message was broadcast to all who were tuning into the lackluster event. While patting each other on the back for lineups of shows few...

Anti-Israel protesters.

Anti-Israel Mob Protesting at Pediatric Cancer Hospital

As the preparatory days before the End Times continue forward, biblical prophecy continues to unfold as the world grows increasingly cold to the Jewish people. Yet few would have imagine that in America the same hatred that led to the...

Woman's hands with open Bible and highlighter

Man Who Spent 23 Minutes in Hell: How Do We Understand God?

A common misconception among Christians is the belief that man cannot understand God’s ways. We often hear people use the phrase, “God’s ways are not our ways” referencing the verse in Isaiah 55:8–9 (NKJV), which says, “‘For My thoughts are...

Bible Davids

2024: The Year of the Shift?

Is 2024 the year of the shift? And if so, what new things are we going to see the Lord do in this new season? In an exclusive Beyond The Article interview with Charisma Magazine Online, apostle Bible Davids is...

1 2 3 4 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
Scroll to Top